Parent’s Language Policies and Language Attitudes in The Family
As citizens of Indonesian society, we should maintain the nation's culture, one of which is cultural heritage, namely the local language or language of each family in Indonesia. So that we as the nation's successors continue to take part in the maintenance and preservation of cultural heritage as a reflection of our identity as children of the nation. The relationship in which education in the family is the goal of national education so that the role of various parties is needed, such as; Teachers, government, facilities and infrastructure, and parents. The aims to be reached in writing this research are; the family language policy adopted by parents at home; Languages coexist (or lose, or gain) in their family environment; the efforts do parents make in learning and maintaining language in their homes. This study uses direct observation methods on the research subject, namely parents. The observations were made in the realm of the family (at home). The data obtained is in the form of a list of statements in the form of the respondent's characteristics, the respondent's response. Interviews in the form of questions and answers about language attitudes and assessment of language and language maintenance. The family language policy implemented by parents at home is frequent, meaning that based on the above percentage results, the policy regarding the language used by parents at home shows "Often" with an overall average percentage value of 50% or half of the expected 100% reviewed from the aspect of the language policy adopted; Language beliefs or ideologies, language practice, and language management. This indicates that the language policy adopted at home with the "Frequently" family is used. Meanwhile, based on the above percentage results, the attitude of the language used by the parents at home shows "disagree" with the overall average percentage value of 40% or 100% of the expected. Their efforts are to use the local language at home, equip their children with various sources both print and non-print, and stay in touch with local ethnic groups. To maintain the local language properly, there must be good cooperation between parents, schools, local government, and the community
Bezcioglu-Goktolga, I., & Yagmur, K. (2018). The home language policy of second-generation Turkish families in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(1), 44–59.
Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2004). Sosiolinguistik: perkenalan awal. Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta.
Cho, G. (2000). The role of the heritage language in social interactions and relationships: Reflections from a language minority group. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(4), 369–384.
Djamareng, J., & Jufriadi, J. (2018). Pengaruh Sikap dan Peran Orang Tua Terhadap Pergeseran Bahasa Luwu di Kalangan Anak-Anak Pada Masyarakat Luwu Kota Palopo. Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research, 1(1), 79–94.
Fasold, R. (1984). The sociolinguistics of society. Ch. 6. Language Attitudes, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Glott, R., Schmidt, P., & Ghosh, R. (2010). Wikipedia survey–overview of results. United Nations University: Collaborative Creativity Group, 8, 1158–1178.
Gomaa, Y. A. (2011). Language maintenance and transmission: The case of Egyptian Arabic in Durham, UK. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 46.
Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2005). Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance, and: Language Death and Language Maintenance: Theoretical, Practical, and Descriptive Approaches. Language, 81(4), 965–974.
Kheirkhah, M., & Cekaite, A. (2015). Language maintenance in a multilingual family: Informal heritage language lessons in parent-child interactions. Multilingual, 34(3), 319–346.
King, K. A. (2000). Language Ideologies and Heritage Language Education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 3(3), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050008667705
King, K. A. (2006). Child language acquisition. An introduction to language and linguistics, ed. by Ralph Fasold and Jeff Connor-Linton, 205–34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
King, K. A., Fogle, L., & Logan‐Terry, A. (2008). Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), 907–922.
Kircher, R., & Fox, S. (2019). Attitudes towards Multicultural London English: implications for attitude theory and language planning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(10), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1577869
Lou, N. M., & A. Noels, K. (2018). Western and heritage cultural internalizations predict EFL students’ language motivation and confidence. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1508277
Park, S. M. (2013). Immigrant students’ heritage language and cultural identity maintenance in multilingual and multicultural societies. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 30–53.
Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Hayati Nupus, Riandi Riandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party. Journal of English Education Studies (JEEP) allow the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.